Do you ever wonder, what would our country look like
if the election of 2016 had gone differently? How would having an
establishment president, hand-picked by globalist elites, have
affected the United States of America?
Try looking across the pond. What do we see?
Rampant and unchecked immigration, expanding no-go zones, rescue
personnel refusing to enter dangerous areas without armed escort,
police refusing to enter altogether; France building an "aesthetic
perimeter" to minimize carnage around its signature masterpiece,
the Eiffel Tower; Sweden is telling its citizens to look on the
bright side of GRENADE ATTACKS; Poland, one of the few nations in
Europe not inundated with hostile migrants, is being told by the EU
that they must accept "refugee quotas," or else face
international consequences.
But perhaps saddest of all, Britain too faces
cultural extinction and mass suicide by immigration, or rather,
invasion. Acid attacks, knifings, cars used as weapons to mow down
pedestrians, children abducted and abused and murdered by the
hundreds, and the government won't do anything about it for fear of
committing that unspeakable crime of racism. ISIS killers are
allowed back into the country without question, and the public is
told that police cannot possibly be expected to apprehend or even to
monitor these murderers because of limited resources and the need to
prioritize their efforts, all the while running hither and thither to
investigate and arrest British citizens for saying mean things
online.
In the latest and most publicly visible outrage, the
UK has arrested, interrogated, and banned political activists for
"hate crimes" Martin Sellner was arrested and detained for
planning to give a speech on the threats to free speech at Speakers'
Corner in London. Brittany Pettibone was also held, her crime being
a planned interview with Tommy Robinson. Lauren Southern was
arrested and detained under TERRORISM LAWS for mocking the islamic
god. All three of these people have been deported and banned from
the UK, without trial, without having committed any crime, while
known jihadist killers are welcomed with open arms and allowed to
roam the streets of Britain and prey upon the defenceless populace,
all the while feeding off the country's welfare system at the expense
of the taxpayers whose lives they threaten.
That's the grand injustice of this state of affairs:
authorities used legitimate danger of violent extremists as
justification for almost absolute control and emergency security
laws, only to turn and use those laws against peaceful civilians who
dare question the status quo, while allowing the hostile radicals
that the laws were made to protect against to come and go with a wink
and free check.
If there was any doubt in your mind about whether
Britain is still a free country, look again; they have left us no
room for doubt: Britain is in a state of tyranny, dominated by a
totalitarian government hell-bent on the destruction and replacement
of its own populace by a foreign enemy. Britain is under siege, and
their rulers have opened the gates to the unholy heathen outside.
It seems now glaringly obvious that Britain is past
the point of peaceful resolution of its wretched state; at this point
the possibility of legislative reversal of the
governmentally-sanctioned invasion seems a far-flung daydream, and
the only alternative, revolution, will almost certainly never happen.
The enemy have corrupted and crippled the populace from the inside
out, precluding even the possibility of the victims standing up for
themselves. The average citizen of urban Britain has been
nutritionally crippled and culturally shackled against beyond any
hope of meaningful resistance. There will be no peaceful resolution,
and there cannot be a violent one. Hence, the outcome is inevitable:
England will fall; it is already falling, and its end will be a
lengthy and torturous one, brutal and horrific.
It does beg the question, “WHY?” Why, in the
name of Reason, should a government of a country, let alone multiple
countries, so ardently seek their own destruction? It is the nature
of all living things, from the worms of the earth to the beasts and
fowl and mankind itself, to seek its own self-interest and the
interest of its kind, at the expense of others if necessary: the
fault, when it arises, is always that inflicted upon the “other,”
not the self. Nowhere in nature will you find any species that
sacrifices its own young for the sake of another species, even
another, foreign, group of its own kind. It is the paramount
directive of nature to seek self-preservation, or failing that, the
survival of the young. Without that, no species can last.
But now we see entire countries that have set aside
self-preservation, sacrificing their own for the sake of the invader.
The hen-house has been opened and let in the wolves, and the
chickens tell each-other not to be racist even as they are eaten.
This is a phenomena never before seen in the history of the world;
that leaders should willingly gut their own countries is beyond
stupid, and evil of a sort absolutely unprecedented. I submit to
you, this evil that defies the most fundamental principles of nature
is beyond human evil; every evil deed in history, unless committed by
a madman, has always been in the interest of the evil-doer, at least
as they see it. The leaders of Europe are behaving like madmen in
concert, acting absolutely against their own interests beyond any
doubt or stretch of the imagination.
So the question is, whose interest are they acting
in? If they're not serving themselves, whom are they serving?
So when you look at the state of the world today, you
should thank Almighty God in heaven that America, for a time at
least, has been spared. And we must be vigilant, and prepared to act
in whatever way necessary, to defend ourselves from the forces that
seek our destruction.
Dust off your Bibles, and oil your guns. Be ready,
for whatever happens. And whatever you do, never, ever, become
complacent. The fate of your life, your very soul, rests on
vigilance.
